<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Asking the Hard Questions About Telehealth	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://telehealth.today/asking-the-hard-questions-about-telehealth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://telehealth.today/asking-the-hard-questions-about-telehealth/</link>
	<description>Dr. Miltie Presents the Telehealth Home Health and Remote Patient Monitoring Solution Powered by aTouchAway™ and Featuring Customized Pathways of Care and the Proprietary Circle of Care™ - Dr. Miltie is a Recognized Innovator in Remote Health and Patient Monitoring,  Chronic Care Management, and Patient-Focused, On-Demand, Healthcare Delivery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SC RHTP Funding Pillars and Dr. Miltie N9+ &#183; Telehealth.Today		</title>
		<link>https://telehealth.today/asking-the-hard-questions-about-telehealth/#comment-5</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SC RHTP Funding Pillars and Dr. Miltie N9+ &#183; Telehealth.Today]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.drmiltie.com/?p=32385#comment-5</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] For reimbursement-focused stakeholders, the practical value is tied to better documentation and more clinically grounded encounters. No device alone guarantees payment success, and policy varies by service type and payer. Still, tools that improve the relevance of remote assessments can support care models that fit more naturally within chronic care management, remote patient monitoring, and related connected-care frameworks. That is often a stronger strategic position than relying only on low-acuity video visits. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For reimbursement-focused stakeholders, the practical value is tied to better documentation and more clinically grounded encounters. No device alone guarantees payment success, and policy varies by service type and payer. Still, tools that improve the relevance of remote assessments can support care models that fit more naturally within chronic care management, remote patient monitoring, and related connected-care frameworks. That is often a stronger strategic position than relying only on low-acuity video visits. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
